While I suspect China lags the US in knowing about its citizens, China might be catching up quickly.
In light of last week's 4 million strong data breach, described as one of the largest thefts of government data ever seen, TK Keanini, CTO at Lancope, offers the following.
"Last Thursday night, U.S. officials said that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) had suffered a breach. Data from four million current and former federal employees, across numerous government agencies, may have been stolen by Chinese hackers. It does not take a security expert to see a pattern taking place here. Most of the attacks allegedly from China over the past few years have gone after the personal information of US citizens, and there is no sign that this trend will diminish. It is fair to assume at this point in the game, China may have more accurate information on US citizens than the US itself.
"The OPM manages security clearances for various government organisations. During that process, employees must provide extreme detail to every aspect of their life – which is in turn stored and kept in the same systems that were breached.
"Organizational confidence takes a long-time to build, but can (and is) eroded much more quickly. Governmental breaches put these trusted government organizations in the same light as all the recent private company breaches (like Target, Home Depot). Much like your personal medial history, the big difference here is the government has much more sensitive data about their victims, and the victims have no choice in sharing that data.
"This attack once again exemplifies the need for more security resourcing in the federal government and the need for a different more comprehensive approach to incident detection and response. The current methodologies have lead to this breach – not avoided them. Attacks are being detected much too late in the attack continuum. Effective security these days means detecting these threat actors as they operate and before they exfiltrate data. You can't win all the battles but all of these headlines suggest that we are still on the losing side.
"In particular, organizations need to categorize and isolate what they need to protect, place additional controls around that information, and meticulously log & monitor access to that encrypted data.
For example, some past advanced attacks have targeted Windows administrative accounts. Smart organizations have realized this, and created a separate isolated set-up for domain admin accounts, with additional security controls around them (like dual factor authentication, jump boxes that are the only place domain admin activity can occur and logging and monitoring of that separate set-up). This isn’t fast, easy or cheap, but organizations have been pushed into adding these controls by ongoing attacks.
"In addition, organizations need to leverage telemetry, and leave hackers no place to hide. If there is a blind spot on your network, someone will be hiding there. Find them and remove them in a way that they can't get back in. These types of incident detection and response approaches have been vastly under-funded in the past, but as these hacks increase, we will see a shift in focus. Until organizations get better at doing this, we can guarantee that the Chinese will continue to have better data on US citizens than anyone in this country does and this information superiority is what scares me the most."
Monday, June 8, 2015
Thursday, June 4, 2015
Call for Chapters: Information Security Management Handbook, Seventh Edition
Information Security Management Handbook, Seventh Edition
We've updated the Call for Chapters for the new edition of the handbook, which is following the National Cybersecurity Workforce Framework.
Securely Provision
Operate and Maintain
Protect and Defend
Investigate
Collect and Operate
Analyze
Oversight and Development
If interested in participating in this new edition please contact Rich O'Hanley (rich.ohanley@taylorandfrancis.com) or Peter Stephenson (pstephen@norwich.edu).
Monday, June 1, 2015
Why Insider Threats Are Succeeding
Why Insider Threats Are Succeeding
As corporate networks expand in scope and geographic area, it has become easier for insider threats to access sensitive data and inflict catastrophic damage. While the malicious insider comes with a different set of challenges than other security concerns, organizations can protect themselves with the right tools and mindset. In this article, Lancope CTO TK Keanini explains why early detection of these attackers can keep a security event from becoming a high-profile data breach.
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Protecting Mobile Networks and Devices 2015: Call for Book Chapter
Protecting Mobile Networks and Devices 2015
Call for Book Chapters: Protecting Mobile Networks and Devices: Challenges and Solutions (CRC Press-Taylor & Francis)
Monday, May 18, 2015
Operational Models of Corporate Security Intelligence
This excerpt from Corporate Security Intelligence and Strategic Decision Making discusses why it is useful to have a model of intelligence to help guide structures, processes, and the deployment of resources. It then introduces a simple security intelligence model, applicable to any scale of deployment. Finally, it discuss aspects of a common dedicated countercrime model (the National Intelligence Model).
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Hackers Hit Starbucks Mobile Users to Steal Credit Card Credentials
Credit card hackers are targeting Starbucks gift card and mobile payment users and stealing from consumers' credit cards. This new scam is so ingenious, the cyber criminals don't even need to know the account number of the card they are hacking! By taking advantage of the Starbucks auto-reload feature, they can steal hundreds of dollars in a matter of minutes. Because the crime is so simple, it can escalate quickly.
"This hack underscores the need for companies to protect all of the sensitive information they hold on their customers," said Brendan Rizzo, technical director EMEA, HP Security Voltage. "Criminals are always looking for a way to exploit a system in a way that they can then turn into cold hard cash. In this case, there is a further risk in that the app stores and displays personal information about the user such as their name, full address, phone number and email address. Criminals could then use this information or sell it on for use in more targeted larger-scale spear-phishing or identity theft attacks. Beyond the threat to customers' sensitive data, companies need to be concerned with the impact such an event can have on their reputation and, ultimately, on their bottom line. A data-centric approach to security is the key cornerstone needed to allow companies to mitigate the risk and impact of these types of attacks."
"16 Million Starbucks customer who utilize their mobile payment service may have been compromised as part of a organized attack," observed Stephen Coty, chief security evangelist, Alert Logic. "There have been reports of the mobile app being manipulated to hijack funds once the mobile device is reloaded with funds from a credit or gift card. There has been conversations through Twitter about customers seeing fraud taking place with their Starbucks accounts. Starbucks has said that they process approximately $2 billion in mobile payments
"The timing of this attack is very interesting since, just about a week ago, Starbucks had an issue in their stores with their payment system not allowing for the processing of credit cards. Makes you think what exactly happened to the payment system that shut down the service for a day and gave attackers an opportunity to compromise a part of their system."
Gavin Reid, VP of threat intelligence, Lancope, points out that, "Nothing too new here – if you guess the username and password for an account that is backed by you bank bad things can and will follow. This highlights problems with using consumer cards and accounts that are backed up with either a high limit credit card or even worse the current checking account. Ideally vendors would make this form of compromise harder by using multi factor authentication and the banks themselves would issue one-time-use account numbers that contain a fixed amount of cash limiting the loss. This type of small amount theft can be automated reusing already exposed credentials. Consumers can protect themselves by setting hard to guess unique passwords."
Monday, May 4, 2015
Fifteen Years After the ILoveYou Bug: Has the Face of Malware Changed?
Where were you when the ILOVEYOU bug started spreading on May 4, 2000, exactly 15 years ago? Was your computer one of the tens of millions of PCs the Love Letter attacked? How has malware changed in the last 15 years? Read on ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)